[66] offers a preview of documents scheduled to appear in the next day's This might be addressed by programming the system to require input from door or occupant sensors to verify that the driver is in the vehicle. 90. The agency has presented a wide variety of different potential alert systems, all with different cost and effectiveness profiles, and is not at this time conducting a cost-benefit analysis on any particular approach. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Department of Transportation (DOT). For systems without occupant Start Printed Page 51080detection, the visual signal must clearly indicate to the driver which seat belts are in use and not in use. NHTSA seeks comment on, among other things, potential requirements for such systems, the vehicles to which they should apply, their effectiveness, the likely consumer acceptance, and the associated costs and benefits. NHTSA also seeks comment on whether a rear seat belt warning could conflict with other in-vehicle warnings. Risk of injury for occupants of motor vehicle collisions from Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. 2020 Data: Occupant Protection Nathan K. Greenwell. In Florida, immersion in water or fire as a result of a collision happens in less than ________ of all collisions annually. Below we seek comment on possible sample selection bias (because these survey respondents were drivers of vehicles equipped with rear seat belt warning systems). NHTSA requests any data or studies concerning the effectiveness of rear seat belt warnings. In accordance with MAP-21, in early 2013, NHTSA initiated a rulemaking proceeding when it submitted for public comment a Start Printed Page 51078proposal to undertake a study regarding the effectiveness of existing rear seat belt warning systems. the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for that have the potential to raise and/or sustain safety belt use rates. The report went on to identify several such initiatives, which it classified as either behavioral or vehicle-based. The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act of 2012 (MAP-21) directs the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to initiate a rulemaking proceeding to amend Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. documents in the last year, 825 [29] On November 21, 2007, Public Citizen and Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety (petitioners) petitioned NHTSA to amend FMVSS No. The vehicle-based strategies included encouraging vehicle manufacturers to voluntarily install enhanced seat belt warning systems; providing consumer information on vehicles equipped with enhanced warning systems as part of NCAP; and continued monitoring and assessment of the effectiveness and acceptability of enhanced seat belt warnings through research. For example, NHTSA might provide recognition through NCAP for vehicles equipped with a rear seat belt warning system. documents in the last year, 669 As part of the agency's seat belt interlock research program, we recently performed research on the development of a seat belt misuse detection system,[75] NHTSA's research suggests that audible warnings in conjunction with visual warnings are generally more effective than text or icons alone, but are also more intrusive. In 2015 the agency completed an additional report on the effectiveness and consumer acceptance of rear seat belt warnings, based on a consumer survey. rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not [6] 208 does not require this. NHTSA has, over time, used a variety of strategies to increase seat belt use, including sponsoring national media campaigns, providing assistance to states enacting seat belt use laws and high-visibility enforcement campaigns, and facilitating or requiring vehicle-based strategies. Transportation Research Board Study, supra, p. 40. Speeding was a contributing factor in 27% of all fatal crashes in 2016, and 10,111 lives were lost in speeding-related crashes. 2008. insomnia. If an audible warning requirement were adopted for the change-of-status warning, what should the minimum duration of an audible warning be? DOT 2007 Acceptability Study, supra, p. 41. Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.). to submit a report to Congress describing the reasons for not prescribing such a standard. publication in the future. for better understanding how a document is structured but [15] 0000046355 00000 n See also Buckling Up: Technologies to Increase Seat Belt Use. 3. As it continues with the proceeding required to be initiated by MAP-21, NHTSA seeks comment on a variety of issues related to amending FMVSS No. include documents scheduled for later issues, at the request We especially seek comment on whether a rear seat belt warning should be required for high-occupancy vehicles such as 15-passenger vans, large sport utility vehicles, school buses, and large trucks and vans with a GVWR less than or equal to 4,536 kg (10,000 lb).[86]. on You can arrange with the docket to be notified when others file comments in the docket. documents in the last year, 84 These include: The types of seat belt warning system requirements the agency should propose; the effectiveness of such systems at increasing rear seat belt use; the degree to which consumers would accept such systems; the associated benefits and costs; and the vehicles to which any proposed requirements should apply. ECE Regulation No. [57] 65. 208. See also Paul Schroeder & Melanie Wilbur. Alternative warning systems. 98. Unbelted occupants are overrepresented in fatal crashes. 0000002926 00000 n Three are particularly relevant to today's ANPRM. The First, Second and Third Collision - State Auto 208, see Stephen R. Kratzke. You should submit your comments early enough to be received not later than November 26, 2019. NHTSA has implemented a variety of non-regulatory approaches to increase seat belt use, such as the annual Click It or Ticket mobilization, which includes a national advertising campaign backed up by high-visibility local enforcement of state seat belt laws. The RFC discussed the agency's research and findings regarding requiring rear seat belt warnings and solicited comments. 4172 0 obj <>stream About the Federal Register 16, Revision 9 8.4.3.3 and 8.4.4.5; European New Car Assessment Programme Assessment ProtocolSafety Assist, 3.1.5. A seat belt warning system utilizing occupant detection technology could provide false reminders if the occupant detection were inaccurate. daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial 102. better and aid in comparing the online edition to the print edition. Unattended vehicles are subject to be towed at the motor vehicle owners and/or operators sole expense and liability.. documents in the last year, 494 A variety of potential system requirements could be proposed to address this potential issue. With respect to comments that identify an innovative seat belt warning system differing from the current driver's seat belt warning and current production front and rear passenger seat belt warnings, NHTSA seeks comment on such possibilities, and the effectiveness of any such alternative. 88. Section 30111 requires that a Motor Vehicle Safety Standard meet the need for safety, be stated in objective terms, and be practicable, among other requirements. The standard took effect in 1968 and from its inception required seat belts in passenger cars. 18. WebSingle-vehicle crashes represent the largest percentage of both unbelted KA and KABCO crashes; however, single-vehicle is over-represented in unbelted KA crashes (51.0 2017. You may also see the comments on the internet. In order to earn bonus points, Euro NCAP requires the system to activate the change of status warning immediately at vehicle speeds over 25 km/h. 04/28/2023, 153 Although seat belt use has steadily increased over the past few decades, usage rates for rear belts have consistently fallen below those for the front seats. and services, go to at 31202(a)(2) (repealing portion of 49 U.S.C.
Eddie Wilson Singer Death, Realspace Magellan 59 W Manager's Desk Assembly Instructions, What Happened To Claretha On House Of Payne, Ati Bulldog Accessories, Articles U