The Supreme Court's oral argument calendar is viewable at http://courts.alaska.gov/appcts.htm. Generally, the justices will hear arguments in the location of the trial court in which the case was originally decided. argue them, are identified on hearing lists for each session and on After more than three hours of oral arguments in a single case last week, Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts uttered the traditional closer, "The case is submitted.". And having the chance to argue their brief in front of a judge is the reward Burns-Marshall requested primary physical custody and shared legal custody. 9. Legal Notices The court found that Burns-Marshall had an earning capacity of more than $100,000 per year, while Krogman's current earning capacity was around $15,000 per year and would likely be $50,000 to $55,000 per year after she obtained her nursing degree. In 1967, the court was expanded to five justices, and the chief justice was restricted to a three-year term.[2]. The husband filed a motion to reopen the evidence regarding domestic violence and substance abuse more than a month after the court's oral decision. excel in athletics at every level. 1. TECK AMERICAN INCORPORATED STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES v. VALHALLA MINING LLC, IN RE: THE 2021 REDISTRICTING CASES (Matanuska-Susitna Borough, AVCG LLC v. STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, LANCE PRUITT v. STATE OF ALASKA OFFICE OF LT GOVERNOR KEVIN MEYER DIVISION OF ELECTIONS GAIL FENUMIAI ELIZABETH HODGES SNYDER, MIRANDA v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SOCIAL SERVICES OFFICE OF CHILDREN SERVICES. 0000005790 00000 n The Anchorage property was solely in Burns-Marshall's name. But he could have avoided such a surprise: he could have conducted discovery before trial. Burns-Marshall argues that the court abused its discretion by failing to take into account the costs and risks associated with selling the real property it awarded to him and that it therefore clearly erred in its valuation of the property. From 1884 until the establishment of Alaska Supreme Court, the United States Territorial District Court for the District of Alaska was the highest judicial body in Alaska. and other impacts were raised during oral argument. A party wishing to cite such a decision in a brief or at oral argument should review Alaska Appellate Rule 214(d). Tier I was the golden ticket for public employees in Alaska maybe in the country at the time. Krogman argued that she should have sole legal and exclusive physical custody, and alleged that Burns-Marshall did not care for the child's basic needs. Argument Transcripts; Argument Audio; Calendars and Lists; Courtroom Seating; CASE DOCUMENTS. UAA offers more than 100 degree and certificate programs that consistently prepare students for success after We disagree. Until the creation of the court of appeals in 1980, the supreme court was also required to accept appeals from final decisions in criminal cases; now, however, the court of appeals fills this role, although the supreme court still has jurisdiction to exercise its discretion to accept appeals from decisions of the court of appeals (or upon certification from the court of appeals that the case involves a significant question of constitutional law or an issue of substantial public interest). The ruling struck down as unconstitutional a newly enacted law prohibiting all marijuana possession, holding that the privacy protections afforded by the Alaska constitution protect adults who possess marijuana in their homes. But the governor vetoed about half of the appropriation, and the legislature did not override the veto. Cf. UAA is the premier university in the heart of Alaska's largest city with campuses throughout She argued the superior court erred by relying on a cursory report from. A narrower definition is also compelled by Alaska Supreme Court precedent broadly interpreting the dedicated funds clause found in Article : IX, 7. . Outreach Program (ANIROP), Recruitment and Retention of Each justice faces a judicial retention election after their third year of service and once every ten years thereafter. Superior Court Judge Lybrand (See above note regarding. Oral arguments are scheduled for May 17 in the Texas case, but it is expected to make it to the Supreme Court eventually, along with a case from Washington seeking instead to broaden access to . They also can be removed, suspended, or censured at the discretion of the Supreme Court, based on a recommendation by the Alaska Commission on Judicial Conduct. <<40CB7F5DF974684DB1E850333233716E>]/Prev 227018/XRefStm 1068>> The narrow question this case presented for the Alaska Supreme Court's review was whether the 1976 amendment to the Alaska Constitution exempted the legislatures use of Permanent Fund income from the Constitutions anti-dedication clause. The chief justice holds that office for three years and may not serve consecutive terms. In addition, the supreme court may, at its discretion, hear petitions from non-final decisions by lower courts or original applications in matters in which relief is not otherwise available, including admission to the bar association and attorney discipline matters, as well as questions of state law certified from the United States federal courts. Yakutat customer service is modified to be appointment only. In general, a title called Section 7 of the Alaska Constitution, positively affirms [that] employees rights once gained cannot be removed, Metcalfe said. academic and personal See what's 12. CINA/DL Parties: contact the court at (907) 424-7312 or email 3COmailbox@akcourts.gov for call-in information. Locations & Hours 14. The appointed justice must be approved by the voters on a nonpartisan ballot at the first statewide general election held more than three years after appointment; thereafter, each justice must participate in another retention election every ten years. We've adopted a different strategy in this case from, say, Lieu v. FEC: Our aim is to argue to the originalists on the United States Supreme . Sign up for our free summaries and get the latest delivered directly to you. FAQs on how to participate in a Zoom Hearing/Meeting. Represent Yourself xref During the Supreme Court oral arguments about armative action in October 2022, Justice Elena Kagan asked, "[I]f you're a hospital and you serve a diverse group of patients, is it super important to you to have a diverse set of doctors?" It must accept appeals from final decisions by the superior court in civil cases (including cases which originated in administrative agencies). Fortson v. Fortson, 131 P.3d 451, 456 (Alaska 2006). TermsPrivacyDisclaimerCookiesDo Not Sell My Information, Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select, Stay up-to-date with FindLaw's newsletter for legal professionals. Even students who do not want to become paralegals or assignment, students are expected to produce a document that looks like one that would Parents/Guardians, Alaska Language Assistance Oral arguments this semester took place in the Alaska Supreme Court Courtroom in front of Alaska Supreme Court Justice Jennifer S. Henderson. Teck American, Inc., et al. The Alaska Legislature may change the court's procedural rules by passing an act expressing its intent to do so by a two-thirds majority of both houses. Contact us. In June Burns-Marshall filed a motion to reopen the trial record under Alaska Civil Rule 59 on the grounds that [he] had no notice of the issues to be tried and was unable to present relevant evidence as a result. He argued that he would have presented different evidence at trial if he had notice that Krogman would allege domestic violence and substance abuse.